What if the Aussie ETS comes early Opinion Article

Jul 24, 2013 - 12:00pm

This article was originally published in the ABC's The Drum on 17 July. 

By Erwin Jackson, Deputy CEO, The Climate Institute

- See more at: http://www.climateinstitute.org.au/articles/opinion-pieces/will-rudds-ets-save-the-environment-it-depends.html/section/1677#sthash.PJX8oqQm.dpuf
This article was originally published in the ABC's The Drum on 17 July. 

By Erwin Jackson, Deputy CEO, The Climate Institute

- See more at: http://www.climateinstitute.org.au/articles/opinion-pieces/will-rudds-ets-save-the-environment-it-depends.html/section/1677#sthash.PJX8oqQm.dpuf
This article was originally published in Environmental Finance on 23 July.

Erwin Jackson
Deputy CEO, The Climate Institute

Australia’s Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, wants to end the fixed price on carbon emissions (the “carbon tax” as it’s been unfortunately dubbed) a year early, on 30 June 2014, and bring forward a switch to a European-style emissions trading system (ETS). This may have important implications for Australia’s global climate diplomacy.

The plan still needs to be legislated, and this may not occur until after the general election is held in coming months. At the moment, it’s not even clear if Rudd will be elected.

For Australia, an ETS means that the largest emitting firms (accounting for 60% of the emissions) have a cap, or limit, as well as a price on their emissions.Under the fixed price, the cost of carbon per tonne was set at A$25.40 (US$23.42) in 2014/15. A move to a floating price would likely drop it to A$6-A$10, as Australian companies would be allowed to access EU and Kyoto markets to meet part of their emission liabilities.

In a way, these changes would make it easier for Australia – one of the world’s worst polluters per capita – to achieve significant emissions abatement at a lower cost. It would also largely determine how much Australia contributes to ongoing international efforts to reduce emissions.

The changes won’t affect the setting of the emission limit under the ETS. An independent process is already underway into Australia’s national targets through the Climate Change Authority.

Both sides of the political debate in Australia agree that the country should reduce its emissions by between 5% and 25% by 2020.


In addition to the ambition and credibility of domestic policy settings, Australia’s action in setting a strong cap influences other countries in building an agreement that covers commitments from all major economies.


By moving early to place a limit on emissions, an opportunity arises to align Australia’s domestic policies with the stated national climate interest of avoiding a 2oC increase global temperature ahead of important international events, like the UN Secretary General world leaders’ summit on climate ambition next year and the development of a new global agreement in 2015.

While they disagree on which mechanisms to employ, both sides of the political debate in Australia agree that the country should reduce its emissions by between 5% and 25% by 2020. Higher targets are conditional on certain levels of international action.The more ‘facilitative’ approach that has emerged since Copenhagen has seen the majority of major emitters making international commitments to constrain emissions, and has given rise to international discussions about a ‘spectrum of commitments’ and how to put in place a peer review process to underscore this approach.

A 2015 agreement would very likely involve countries advancing self-selected targets and contributions, with these commitments to be reviewed by the international community. After this review, targets would be inscribed in a new agreement and subject to transparency provisions. That, later, is likely to be very important to both the US and China as they seek to overcome perceived competitiveness concerns in domestic constituencies.

In this scenario, the credibility and ambition of Australia’s domestic policy settings will become more important under the new 2015 agreement. A policy that can meet stated international targets is central to building the credibility of the emerging architecture, building global ambition, and avoiding negative responses from other major economies.

This has a number of implications for Australia’s emissions goals, the cap-setting process in 2014, and the role we play internationally.

Many will remember the damaging role Australia played in its initial refusal to ratify the Kyoto ProtocolIt illustrates that the self-selection of credible goals is paramount to effective global action in the short-term. At present, solid self-selected commitments consistent with 2oC are the only way Australia’s national interest will be achieved.

In addition to the ambition and credibility of domestic policy settings, Australia’s action in setting a strong cap influences other countries in building an agreement that covers commitments from all major economies.

Many will remember the damaging role Australia played in its initial refusal to ratify the Kyoto Protocol. More recently, ratification of the Kyoto Protocol, the subsequent commitment to a second commitment period target, and implementation of carbon laws have been strongly welcomed by the international community.

This has allowed Australia to play a more proactive and positive role in brokering agreements between different negotiating blocs. For example, Australia’s credibility in the Cartagena Dialogue has been strongly influenced by our domestic policy settings and participation in the Kyoto Protocol. The Cartagena Dialogue played a pivotal role in securing the Cancun Agreements in 2010.

Australia’s real economy looks very similar to Canada’s except Australia has ‘skin in the game’ – Australia’s participation in the legally-binding regime and enacted domestic policies means we are more credible and have more leverage than Canada. This diplomatic capacity and political leverage provides a progressive voice, in contrast with some of our counterparts.

Extending this further, Australia has additional influence internationally than many other comparable countries. Our extractive industries and the challenges that Australia faces in its decarbonisation efforts lend it more credibility with many middle income economies. This contrasts, for example, with Europe, which has relatively limited amounts of industry.

Middle income economies are a critical target audience to influence in the international negotiations, so Australia’s decarbonisation efforts can make an impact on these economies and how they envisage the process and politics of decarbonisation domestically.

In the end, the climate is unlikely to be worse off under the changes. It could, in fact, be better off, if whoever is in government next year ensures that Australia’s regulated limit on emissions meets the nation’s climate interest and constitutes a serious effort towards avoiding 2 degrees Celsius.

Erwin Jackson

Erwin is Deputy CEO of The Climate Institute. With nearly 20 years practical experience in climate change policy and research, Erwin has developed and led many national and international programs aimed at reducing greenhouse pollution. This work has been undertaken in Australia, Europe, North and South America, the Pacific and Antarctica. He has represented non-governmental groups and advised government and business in national, regional and international fora, including being a non-governmental expert reviewer of the reports of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Erwin has written, researched and produced many publications on climate change and energy policy including a number of review papers in scientific journals such as the Medical Journal of Australia.
Email   Print   Subscribe
Contact us. For further information. Follow us. Join the conversation.
 
Sydney

Level 15, 179 Elizabeth St.
Sydney NSW 2000
Tel   +61 2 8239 6299
Fax   +61 2 9283 8154
info@climateinstitute.org.au
 
 
Site Map
 
 
 
 
 
PLATFORM + DESIGN BY GLIDER