May 20, 2014 - 11:29am
This article first appeared in the Medical Journal of Australia on 19 May 2014 (see PDF below).
Professor Tony McMichael
Board Member, The Climate Institute
The climate has long been considered beyond human control, other than through sacrifice and prayer. In modern times, there has been little interest in studying climatic influences on human health, disease and mortality. We can reduce cigarette smoking and make workplaces safer, but we cannot change the climate. Or so we thought. Now, with the advent of human-driven climate change, we need to know how climatic conditions affect health.
The section of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fifth Assessment Report on “impacts, adaptation and vulnerability” was released on 31 March this year. The chapter on human health, as for other sector- specific chapters, comprises a comprehensive, externally peer-reviewed assessment of all relevant scientific literature by an expert international author team.
Many previously anticipated health impacts are now materialising, making adaptation increasingly necessary in light of the dismal 20-year delay in effective international abatement (“mitigation”) action. This delay sits comfort ably with the current Australian Government’s preoccupation with making the world safe — not for the wellbeing of future generations, but for economic growth today.
Most of the biosphere’s biophysical and ecological systems that help sustain human population health are climate-sensitive: plant growth; the water cycle; constraints on infectious disease spread; and forest, reef and mangrove buffers. Hence, climate-related impacts on health signify much more than mere collateral damage; they signal that nature’s life-supporting system is being disrupted sufficiently to harm human populations, their cultural insulation notwithstanding.
The directly harmful paths are familiar: deaths and hospitalisations from heatwaves; dehydration and injuries in overheated workplaces; traumatic impacts of severe floods, storms and fi res; and exacerbation of urban air pollution. But those are the visible tip of a much larger (ahem) iceberg. The most serious risks to health arise from disrupting nature’s ecological and biophysical systems. Further, the associated economic and social consequences will often lead to job loss, impoverishment, migration and conflict, all of which are potential causes of illness, disease, depression and premature death.
The IPCC human health chapter concludes that climate change over the next few decades will mainly act by exacerbating existing health problems. The greatest impacts will occur — indeed, are occurring — in populations already burdened by climate-sensitive health problems such as child diarrhoea, nutritional stunting and urban heat extremes. Human-driven warming has increased heat-related death and illness in many locations, while changes in temperature and rainfall have altered the distribution of some waterborne infectious diseases and reduced food yields in some food-insecure populations. These adverse health impacts will widen the existing health gap between regions and between rich and poor.6 Climate change, unabated, will erode development gains — an issue now of explicit concern to the World Bank and, in our own region, the Asian Development Bank.
More positively, the IPCC chapter stresses the immediate “co-benefits” to local health from undertaking actions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. These include gains in physical health from cleaner urban–industrial air, better public transport and lesser car reliance; reduced exposure to temperature extremes in energy-efficient housing; and healthier diets due to transformative changes in producing and processing food.
Meanwhile, Australia’s Bureau of Meteorology and CSIRO (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation) project that temperatures will continue rising, with more extremely hot days and fewer extremely cold days; that average rainfall in southern Australia will decrease, and heavy rainfall will increase over much of the country; and that sea-level rise and ocean acidification will continue.
Yet public discussion of human-driven climate change in Australia remains marred by adversarial dispute, ideological rigidity, an anti-science ethos (why no federal Minister for Science?) and the orchestrated manipulation of doubt. Many vested interests feel threatened. There is a deep-seated problem in Australia, one of just two developed countries (along with Canada) where climate scepticism is strongly entrenched and the national government is openly ambivalent about human-driven climate change. Are young, expansionist “settler” cultures such as the United States, Canada and Australia prone to complacent disdain for tackling big, complex and inconvenient issues? Our Prime Minister repeats endlessly that Australia is “a land of droughts and flooding rains”, a simplistic ploy that helps to sustain a land of doubts and fuddled brains.
There are many challenges for the health sector, including reducing the sector’s carbon footprint, attuning facilities and training to likely climate-related needs (as the defence sector is doing), enhancing surveillance systems, facilitating epidemiological research and monitoring, and joining intersectoral decision making about adaptation strategies. Doctors are citizens and their professional organisations are part of society’s institutional fabric; both should engage with the wider community in seeking effective national action on climate change. Doctors for the Environment Australia (http://dea.org.au) is providing strong leadership on this front, and harnessing the energy and concerns of many young doctors.
The human health dimension of climate change has long been largely overlooked; concerns have focused on risks to tangibles “out there” — coastlines, property damage, electricity costs, iconic species and ski slopes. Those are all important, but they fall far short of recognising that our collective climate-changing actions jeopardise social stability and the healthy life of Homo sapiens and of the many species with which we share our world. The health professions must engage
.See references in below PDF.
As noted elsewhere on our website, Tony sadly passed away unexpectedly on 26 September 2014. He will be dearly missed by all staff, Board members and supporters of The Climate Institute. Emeritus Professor Tony McMichael was an environmental epidemiologist at the Australian National University (ANU) in Canberra, with a long record of research and publication. The Tony McMichael Climate and Human Impacts Research Fund has been established in his memory to honour the family’s wishes. Please contact us if you wish to make a donation to this memorial fund.